“Let me lay to rest the bugaboo of what is called devaluation… The effect of this action, in other
words, will be to stabilize the dollar.” said Nixon as he ended the dollar’s, and therefore the world’s,
monetary link to gold. Since then, we have left the gold standard, and have been on the PhD standard.
Has the stewardship of our money by Fed chairpeople and bank governors been a success? Has
the ability of our wise and learned betters to steer the ship of the economy led us to tranquil harbours
or stormy seas? Will the next iceberg finally return us to the “barbarous relic”, or will we remain
anchored in an even older system by which our rulers control and ruin our money?
The Ducat and the Florin are familiar-sounding currency units. These are the renaissance currencies
of Venice and Florence which gained widespread acceptance all over Europe. The reason these
republican currencies became so widespread is that the local currencies in England, France and
various German duchies were being constantly devalued by their sovereigns. This “royal standard”
was the precursor to our modern PhD standard and was just as immoral, corrupt and ineffective.
Once England and the Netherlands adopted the gold standard it was the Pound and Guilder that
became international units of account, because they were anchored to gold and were not frequently revalued.
After nearly a century of relative stability and prosperity under the gold standard, Keynes and his
acolytes advocated a great new diet pill that would smooth out the business cycle and deliver high
constant growth and stable prices. These days, Keynes’ playbook is economic orthodoxy and the
policy response to the last crises has shown the effectiveness of his ideas, or rather the ideas of his
school of economics.
The results are clear, Keynesian stimulus doesn’t smooth out the business cycle, it lengthens it and
makes it more extreme. The dot-com boom and bust, as well as the housing bubble were a direct
result of artificially low interest rate policies. The response each time is to take rates even lower for
even longer, from LIRP to ZIRP to NIRP. Such policy responses cause malinvestments by
desperate yield-hungry would-be savers. Also, it prevents previous malinvestments from being
reallocated creating a fertile breeding ground for unicorns and zombies.
The ultimate proof that these policies don’t work will be the necessary conclusion of this latest round
of monetary excess: the next crisis. The US stock market, subprime auto lending, cryptocurrencies
and fine art are showing signs of volatility after a prolonged period of inflation far beyond what can be
merited by the fundamentals. This volatility, coming with rising (but still low) real and nominal interest
rates are a sign that these bubbles are popping. 2018 could well go down as the year of the next
crisis.
The response, predictably, will be a fast return to ZIRP/NIRP as well as massive money printing
poorly disguised by the academic term Quantitative Easing. Will it work this time round? Will they
manage to avert a real recession by inflating an even bigger bubble than the even bigger bubble?
This time they might be out of road, the nominal or real value of these assets will have to return to
their fundamentals, either by a collapse in their price, or by a collapse in the currency they are
denominated in.
And when the dust settles will we have learned anything? The socialists and central planners who
are creating this disaster-in-the-making will swiftly blame it on the excesses of capitalism, as if this
current state of affairs can be straight-facedly described as capitalism. In capitalism you don’t fix
prices, least of all the most important price of all: interest. Also, you don’t bail anyone out. Once it is
clear that the current direction has lead us to ruin, will we double-down on socialism or truely change
direction?
Bangalore April 16th 2018
TLDR: Mainstream economics is flawed. The coming crisis will be a catalyst for change for better or worse.
![]() |
| Under socialism, you have 3 cows, and they eat garbage in the street |

No comments:
Post a Comment